<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: H.264: Quicktime Mac &gt; Quicktime Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/</link>
	<description>Tech in the eyes of cavemonkey50.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: clever</title>
		<link>http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-56307</link>
		<dc:creator>clever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/#comment-56307</guid>
		<description>What are you on about? Anyone with even a modicum of tech savvy knows PC&#039;s are faster than Macs especially the crappy PowerPC processors which is why apple have now swapped to Intel processors (and for many applications, a top-end single core processor rocks all over the dual core ones Apple use because most apps don&#039;t or can&#039;t use threads very well).

Try compiling some stuff with gcc. Do it again on your similar specification PC. Enough said.

This is coming from someone who has been exclusively a Mac user for 18 months at home and 12 months at work now too. There are an awful lot of great points to be made for Mac but they don&#039;t get to wear the speed crown. Get a grip already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you on about? Anyone with even a modicum of tech savvy knows PC&#8217;s are faster than Macs especially the crappy PowerPC processors which is why apple have now swapped to Intel processors (and for many applications, a top-end single core processor rocks all over the dual core ones Apple use because most apps don&#8217;t or can&#8217;t use threads very well).</p>
<p>Try compiling some stuff with gcc. Do it again on your similar specification PC. Enough said.</p>
<p>This is coming from someone who has been exclusively a Mac user for 18 months at home and 12 months at work now too. There are an awful lot of great points to be made for Mac but they don&#8217;t get to wear the speed crown. Get a grip already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lugave</title>
		<link>http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-45033</link>
		<dc:creator>lugave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/#comment-45033</guid>
		<description>goota say big thanks. i&#039;ve looked for two weeks for  a player that could handle h.264 in windows. downloaded quicktime for windows - pure crap! all the codec converters in the world - more crap. vlc - jackpot! ta mate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goota say big thanks. i&#8217;ve looked for two weeks for  a player that could handle h.264 in windows. downloaded quicktime for windows &#8211; pure crap! all the codec converters in the world &#8211; more crap. vlc &#8211; jackpot! ta mate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-42376</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/#comment-42376</guid>
		<description>really im on a G5 at school and all 1080P quicktime H.264 clips without a hickup perfectly smooth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really im on a G5 at school and all 1080P quicktime H.264 clips without a hickup perfectly smooth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zareste</title>
		<link>http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-42241</link>
		<dc:creator>Zareste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/#comment-42241</guid>
		<description>Once again &#039;more megahertz&#039; is not equal to &#039;faster&#039; and there&#039;s no conspiracy at hand.  I have a G5 and quicktime still plays H.264 like crap at full-screen, but VCL does it without a problem, so this just means Apple is clueless when it comes to video playback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again &#8216;more megahertz&#8217; is not equal to &#8216;faster&#8217; and there&#8217;s no conspiracy at hand.  I have a G5 and quicktime still plays H.264 like crap at full-screen, but VCL does it without a problem, so this just means Apple is clueless when it comes to video playback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-41610</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cavemonkey50.com/2006/02/h264-quicktime-mac-quicktime-windows/#comment-41610</guid>
		<description>Err. What? Your conclusion is hair-brained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err. What? Your conclusion is hair-brained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
