<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cavemonkey50.com &#187; unity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cavemonkey50.com/tag/unity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cavemonkey50.com</link>
	<description>Tech in the eyes of cavemonkey50.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization Technologies Improve on Intel Macs</title>
		<link>http://cavemonkey50.com/2007/06/virtualization-technologies-improve-on-intel-macs/</link>
		<comments>http://cavemonkey50.com/2007/06/virtualization-technologies-improve-on-intel-macs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Heft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cavemonkey50.com/2007/06/virtualization-technologies-improve-on-intel-macs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past week the battle of virtualization technologies heated up. Parallels released Parallels Desktop 3 and VMware released Fusion Beta 4. The new versions were big for both companies. Parallels touted DirectX support and snapshots, while VMware promoted Unity. Essentially, both programs added features which the other already had. Being a user of Parallels from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past week the battle of virtualization technologies heated up. Parallels released <a href="http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/">Parallels Desktop 3</a> and VMware released <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/beta/fusion/">Fusion Beta 4</a>. The new versions were big for both companies. Parallels <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWU4DTOP9ys">touted DirectX support</a> and snapshots, while VMware <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIApJMzGzDQ">promoted Unity</a>. Essentially, both programs added features which the other already had.</p>
<p>Being a user of Parallels from the start, I thought I would be excited about Parallels 3, but VMware managed to sway me over. I was getting frustrated with the performance of Parallels, and the extra cost of version 3 was icing on the cake. Sure, Parallels is a bit more polished, but it lacks on basic performance. VMware has supported 64-bit chips, dual core utilization, and DirectX since the early betas, while Parallels just now added DirectX and still lacks 64-bit and dual core support. Besides, I noticed VMware runs a heck of a lot smoother on my computer compared to Parallels.</p>
<p><span id="more-1337"></span>VMware has been in the virtualization market a lot longer than Parallels, so I have a feeling when Fusion comes out of beta, it will be superior to Parallels. Although, there is no telling what could come. For the most part, Vista is still untouched by both companies, leaving Aero support up for grabs. Not to mention Apple might surprise us with a virtualization announcement at WWDC. However, I feel VMware is reigning supreme on the Mac for now and will for sometime to come. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cavemonkey50.com/2007/06/virtualization-technologies-improve-on-intel-macs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
